PAUL MITCHELL LAB Trademark

Trademark Overview


On Monday, January 7, 2002, a trademark application was filed for PAUL MITCHELL LAB with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The USPTO has given the PAUL MITCHELL LAB trademark a serial number of 76355397. The federal status of this trademark filing is ABANDONED - EXPRESS as of Wednesday, May 8, 2002. This trademark is owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS. The PAUL MITCHELL LAB trademark is filed in the Cosmetics & Cleaning Products category with the following description:

HAIR CARE PREPARATION, NAMELY A STYLING AND FINISHING AIDE
paul mitchell lab

General Information


Serial Number76355397
Word MarkPAUL MITCHELL LAB
Filing DateMonday, January 7, 2002
Status601 - ABANDONED - EXPRESS
Status DateWednesday, May 8, 2002
Registration Number0000000
Registration DateNOT AVAILABLE
Mark Drawing1000 - Typeset: Word(s) / letter(s) / number(s)
Published for Opposition DateNOT AVAILABLE

Trademark Statements


Goods and ServicesHAIR CARE PREPARATION, NAMELY A STYLING AND FINISHING AIDE
Pseudo MarkPAUL MITCHELL LABORATORY

Classification Information


International Class003 - Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices.
US Class Codes001, 004, 006, 050, 051, 052
Class Status Code6 - Active
Class Status DateWednesday, January 16, 2002
Primary Code003
First Use Anywhere DateThursday, January 31, 2002
First Use In Commerce DateThursday, January 31, 2002

Trademark Owner History


Party NameJOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
Party Type10 - Original Applicant
Legal Entity Type03 - Corporation
AddressSAUGUS, CA 91350

Trademark Events


Event DateEvent Description
Wednesday, May 8, 2002ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Wednesday, May 1, 2002ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Monday, March 18, 2002CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Monday, April 29, 2002AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Tuesday, February 26, 2002USE AMENDMENT FILED
Tuesday, February 26, 2002CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE