MEXOIL Trademark

Trademark Overview


On Friday, August 19, 1994, a trademark application was filed for MEXOIL with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The USPTO has given the MEXOIL trademark a serial number of 74563032. The federal status of this trademark filing is ABANDONED - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE as of Friday, November 22, 1996. This trademark is owned by Sanchez Healy, Inc.. The MEXOIL trademark is filed in the Lubricant & Fuel Products category with the following description:

automotive oil lubricants refined from Mexican crude

General Information


Serial Number74563032
Word MarkMEXOIL
Filing DateFriday, August 19, 1994
Status602 - ABANDONED - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE
Status DateFriday, November 22, 1996
Registration Number0000000
Registration DateNOT AVAILABLE
Mark Drawing1000 - Typeset: Word(s) / letter(s) / number(s)
Published for Opposition DateNOT AVAILABLE

Trademark Statements


Goods and Servicesautomotive oil lubricants refined from Mexican crude

Classification Information


International Class004 - Industrial oils and greases; lubricants; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels (including motor spirit) and illuminants; candles and wicks for lighting.
US Class Codes015
Class Status Code8 - Abandoned
Class Status DateWednesday, August 4, 1999
Primary Code004
First Use Anywhere DateNOT AVAILABLE
First Use In Commerce DateNOT AVAILABLE

Trademark Owner History


Party NameSanchez Healy, Inc.
Party Type10 - Original Applicant
Legal Entity Type03 - Corporation
AddressChicago, IL 60601

Trademark Events


Event DateEvent Description
Friday, November 22, 1996ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE
Saturday, March 30, 1996CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Friday, January 19, 1996CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Wednesday, October 18, 1995FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Monday, August 14, 1995CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Tuesday, February 21, 1995NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED
Wednesday, February 15, 1995ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Tuesday, December 20, 1994CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE